Methodology
Most bookmaker reviews ask you to trust them. Ours show the receipts: sourced claims, visible check dates and monitored sources. This page explains the rules the desk works by.
Each full review carries an evidence ledger listing the factual claims behind the page: the primary source link or first-hand attestation, and the date we last checked it. If we cannot source a claim, we do not publish it.
Licences and operating companies are read from the operator's own terms and from official registers, never from other review sites. Bonus figures are quoted from the operator's live pages with the date we read them. When an operator's site blocks automated checks, we read it in a real browser and say so.
A numerical scorecard appears only when the desk has a documented first-hand basis for it. Reviews without that basis publish without scores, and we explain the difference on the page rather than inventing a number.
An automated watch re-checks the machine-readable sources weekly. When a source changes or disappears, the claim is re-verified or pulled. Sources that cannot be machine-checked are re-read manually on a monthly cycle and the dates on the page are updated.
We publish what an operator does well and what it does not, including what its own pages leave out, such as an unnamed licensing jurisdiction. A listing is never an endorsement, and affiliate links never change a finding.
Pages inherited without a retained evidence package are held as noindexed archive stubs: no scores, no offers, no claims. A review returns to full publication only after its facts have been rebuilt and sourced under the rules above. That is deliberate, and it is why parts of the directory are still stubs.
Gambling is for adults and is not a source of income. Never gamble with money needed for bills, check the rules in your own jurisdiction before betting, and use regulator-backed support if gambling is affecting your wellbeing.